| |
What is peace education (I)
‘Peace is possible for life at all stages and it is up to man to
choose his destiny or to suffer from the horrors of war. Today
mankind is at the cross- road where he has to choose with
courage, determination and imagination.’
Federico Mayor on seeing this guide a teacher might wonder ‘Is
it really necessary to teach peace as such? Whole education is
for peace. Isn’t it already in the curriculum?’ She may be right
in a sense. But the questions remain: Are we giving adequate
attention today to teach peace? Are our schools really
interested in producing a peaceful young generation ? Is it
enough having mere peace concepts in the curriculum?
Violence is emerging in an unprecedented manner in human
society. Looking at the world today any sensible person feels
disheartened and even horrified to see the kind of violent acts
being committed by man against man and nature. It is sad to
realize that we live in an era of unprecedented violence in the
forms of terrorism, war, crimes, injustice and oppression and
exploitation amidst a seemingly outward development enjoyed by a
few. The majority of mankind lives in stark poverty, struggling
for bare survival. There is so much disorder and confusion in
the society man has built for himself.
The saddest part of the story is that this state of disorder and
confusion in the society is affecting the children’s innocent
minds. Children naturally absorb the spirit of violence in the
atmosphere and will soon grow to be the next generation of
perpetuators of violence. Therefore the need to nurture peace in
the hearts of children has arisen as urgent issues to be
addressed.
Fortunately, a few countries may still remain unaffected by such
forces extending over the surface of the earth. But the
questions remain: How long can they remain so? No country can
remain aloof under the pressures of globalization. Under the
present secular forces education is narrowing down into the
teaching of certain subject matters necessary only for passing
examinations. Due to such subject- centred and
examination-oriented learning at school the purpose and the
beauty of F whole education seems to have much lost. The joy of
learning is taken away from children. They are trained to cope
with the rat race of the corrupt society. Today school is no
more a place of leisure or of peace as the very word ‘school’
means. (The word school drives from Greek ‘&hole meaning
leisure)
Today teachers complain about increasing disciplinary problems
in schools. One teacher says, “I am appalled to see the mindless
behaviour of the adolescents in school. Their mentality seems so
different from us!” The public criticizes the youth whom we
produce at schools as insensitive to the problems of society,
selfish, narrow minded, lacking in intellectual depth and
susceptible to the violent and corrupt social pressures. The
excellence of a few students cannot make up for the rest. R.D.
Laing (1978) puts it this way:
‘A child born today in the U.K. stands a ten times greater
chance of being admitted to a mental hospital than a
university.... We are driving mad our children more effectively
than we are genuinely educating them. ‘
Under the present predicament there is a growing realization in
the world of education today that children should be educated in
the art of peaceful living. As a result, more and more peace
concepts, attitudes, values and behavioural skills are being
integrated into school curricula in many countries. There is
also renewed interest to develop peace-related disciplines such
as values education, moral education, global education, etc. In
the past we seemed to have assumed that the more knowledge
people have, the better they are. Accordingly, we stressed
cognitive learning in schools at the cost of developing
children’s emotional, social, moral and humanistic aspects. The
consequence of such imbalanced learning is evident today in the
forms of youth unrest with their antisocial attitudes and
behavioural problems.
This teachers’ guide introduces an educational approach, by the
name of Peace Education, which can undo certain basic negative
effects discussed above. It attempts to do so by way of bringing
in core human values essential for peaceful and health living.
It provides a wide range of interesting active methods of
teaching and learning to deliver the curriculum effectively
alongside with a focus on core human values. This approach has
been tried out by educationists and teachers in different
countries and found effective. For instance, a student in such a
school in Sri Lanka, writes;
‘‘This programme strongly influenced my mind. I was enlightened
on how to lead a contented life, to live a conflict-free ltfe in
school, to build up mutual co-operation and make our future
happy and successful and most of all, to live as a peaceful
citizen ‘ (National Institute of Education (2000) Bulletin on
Education for Conflict Resolution Programme)
A teacher who had received a short course training on peace
education said at the end, ‘I have never received such a
wonderful experience and knowledge in my teaching career I have
become a changed person with good attitudes. This is indeed a
useful Programme which could bring about peace and harmony to
our country. ‘ (Ibid)
Robin Montz, another teacher, who tried out such an approach in
America writes:
‘School started, and I began to weave into our curriculum some
of the effective exercises I had experienced or read about. And
I saw some “mi- raculous “ things begin to take place. I saw
students form meaningful rela- tionships in the classroom. Isaw
students who had been bored and in trouble much of the time
begin to learn. I saw myself and my own role as teacher begin to
change and to take on new meanings. And I saw genuine relation-
ships begin to develop between myself and my students, not so
much as teacher and pupil, but as people, human beings meeting
each other and leamingLfiom each other ‘. (George Isaac Brown
(1972) Human Teaching and Human Learning, The Gestalt Journal,
Highland NY, page1 68)
Development of Peace Education In tracing the recent development
of peace education, we begin to see that in the past it had been
an integral part of education at all times and in all cultures,
Every culture regards peace as a noble ideal to attain. However
with the advent of Western secularism at the beginning of the
20th century through the guise of a positivist scientific
outlook to education, moral and human values including peace
were slowly discouraged away from school curricula. Under the
ideal of value-free positivist and reductionist knowledge the
whole education was viewed narrowly as teaching facts of various
subjects.
However, in spite of such materialistic views, the thinking of
such humanists like Rousseau, Henry Thoreau, Tolstoy and Maria
Montessori kept the sense of education alive. With the witness
of the horrors of the First and Second World Wars there was-a
reawakening to the need of developing the humanistic side of
education at least among a few educationists. In.this context
Maria Montessori’s loud and tireless reiteration on the need for
educating for peace should be mentioned here with respect and
appreciation. At the beginning of the 21 st century today we are
only rediscovering her vision of peace education which she tried
to tell the world in the 1930s. For instance, she said in one of
her public talks:
Those who want war prepare young people for war; but those, who
want peace have neglected young.children and adolescents so that
they are un- able to organize them for peace.
|
|