| |
Human rights abuse: Chedi,
Rabo demand N100m from FG
From KABIRU YUSUF,Abuja
AS the case filed by the Kano state government over the arrest
of the Commander-General of its Hisbah Corps, Malam Yahya Farouq
Chedi and his deputy, Abubakar Rabo came up yesterday at the
Federal High Court Abuja, where the state government asked the
Court to declare their arrest of February 8, 2006 and their
subsequent detention as unlawful.
The plaintiffs were arrested in Kano on February 8, and brought
to Abuja at midnight and detained for running and managing an
unlawful organization, the Hisbah, which was established by the
Kano state Government.
In his submission before Justice Babs Kuewumi the counsel of the
applicants, Malam Yusuf O. Ali (SAN) prayed the court to award
N50m damage to each of the plaintiffs against the federal
government that ordered their arrest and detention.
Similarly, Yusuf Ali (SAN) prayed the court to order the Federal
government to render public apology to the plaintiffs for the
unlawful arrest which, he said, contradicts the provision of the
Cconstitution.
He said that since March 2nd, 2006 when the fundamental human
rights case was filed asking for reliefs, the respondents has
not done much in response to the suit except their four
paragraphs counter affidavit which he said supported the
plaintiffs case.
He said that where a citizen approaches the court that he was
unlawfully detained by the authority, the onus lies with the
arresting authority to show that there were reasonable grounds
for the arrest and detention.
He said that it was not enough for the respondents to state that
the presence of the plaintiffs in Kano was generating problems
adding that no mayhem reported over the activities of Hisbah
from any part of the state and nobody reported any wrong doing
from Hisbah members.
He submitted that the Hisbah laws which established the
organization that the plaintiffs work for have not been found by
any court to contradict existing laws and the applicants were
operating under the law promulgated by a state assembly and
accented by the state governor.
He also said that the respondents’ averment that they are still
investigating was not tenable because the law did not permit
arrest before investigation pointing out that the arrest and
detention of the plaintiffs contradict the law of the land which
requires the law enforcement agents to finish their
investigations before arresting any accused person.
The counsel further said the respondents have failed woefully to
justify the infringements which he said violate Section 36
Sub-Section 4,5,6 of the 1999 Constitution.
Barrister Yusuf explained that “the law enforcement agencies
that made the arrest acted on the one way facts which means that
the arrest and the detention is unconstitutional”.
The plaintiffs’ counsel therefore, submitted that the
plaintiffs’ arraignments in a separate matter cannot exonerate
the respondents from the damage.
After hearing from the Kano state Counsel, the presiding judge,
Justice Babs Kuewumi, announced that the matter has been
adjourned till February 13th, 2007 to allow the federal
government that was not present at yesterday’s hearing to reply.
|
|