| |
The Buhari
Ticket and ANPP’s Challenge
By Ibrahim Dan-Halilu
idanhalilu@yahoo.com
The nomination of Muhammad Buhari as presidential flag bearer of
the All Nigeria People’s Party (ANPP) for the 2007 election at
the recent convention of the party in Abuja is a trago-comedy in
the political drama that is being staged by our politicians.
That he is being nominated as consensus candidate for the second
time is a clear indication of the failure of our politics to
develop beyond infancy stage.
By this claim, I am not accusing the ANPP of denouncing
democratic principles of freedom of choice. But I’m putting it
side by side with the ruling party, PDP that has been so accused
by Coalition of Nigerian Political parties (CNPP) of failure to
observe rudimentary principles of civil democracy.
My expectations was that the ANPP would try to avoid the
pitfalls that denied it victory at the 2003 presidential polls,
though to many of its supporters, they believe their party won
the presidential elections. After the infamous judgment of the
Court of Appeal on that election, one expected Buhari and his
teeming supporters to take a cursory look at the key issues that
led to the rigging of the 2003 presidential elections and why
the party lost in that election.
It appears the general perception of ANPP leadership and Buhari
himself is that they won the election but the PDP-controlled
federal government manipulated the results. Taken on its first
value, the argument presupposes that the election results did
not reflect the voting pattern of Nigerians. This assertion has
been corroborated in some states by the Court of Appeal when it
cancelled the Presidential election results in Ogun State. But
it is not enough to conclude that ANPP won the election, as the
court explained.
The allegation of massive rigging with connivance of the police
and other security agencies is one issue that has featured
prominently in Buhari’s suit against Obasanjo and the PDP
government though INEC could not produce the authenticated
voters register that was used for that election.
I failed to see the ANPP loss from that perspective. I believe
the party lost because its leadership was so carried away by the
popularity of Buhari in the North that they did not do
sufficient campaigning to deal with key issues denigrating the
image of Buhari and making his presidency a mirage.
First, there was the issue of religious bigotry, which the south
west press has attributed to him. His statement in Sokoto
regarding Muslims votes and Sharia was interpreted by the press
as a repugnant to Christianity and Christians. It is true that
in Nigeria it is quite difficult to correct a wrong impression
and make people accept the true position. But there are other
ways that Buhari could have tackled the image problem. One of
these was for his The Buhari Organization (TBO) to find a
suitable platform to launch a series of dialogues across the
country to discuss his image problem.
The alternative is for the TBO to engage the Nigerian media,
especially the Lagos-Ibadan press which inspired the controversy
over the Sokoto story in the first place, in a continuous
discussion on Nigerian government and politics. It is not
unlikely that the discussions would change the perception of
Nigerians, especially those in the south about him.
The media campaign apart, Buhari needs to build bridges across
the Niger to make genuine friends among the Yorubas, Igbos, and
other southern minorities. Through his networking he can build
trust and understanding with other Nigerians who regard him as a
bigot and a regionalist. The party has to go extra mile to boost
its fortunes in the south through alliances, mergers and
personal contacts.
Besides Buhari’s image problem, there is also the issue of
party’s outlook. For most Nigerians, the ANPP is a northern
political party. For the avoidance of doubt, majority of its
presidential aspirants were northern Muslims and more than half
its key officers are also of northern extraction. With the
exception of Right-Honorable Edwin Ume-Ezeoke, there is no other
influential Igbo man in the party. The only notable Yoruba at
the party’s convention was a Senator who serves as a Secretary.
To be candid, when I watched the party’s convention on my
television screen, I could not deny the claim that it has a
totally northern character.
Due to the persistent crises in its leadership, the party has
not been able to penetrate other parts of the country to recruit
membership and mobilize them to seek elective offices on its
platform. If the party appears too northern to be trusted, the
other option would be for the ANPP to go into alliance with a
south-based party like Zik did with Ahmadu Bello during the
politics of the first republic.
Much as one appreciates the efforts of the party to form an
alliance with the Action Congress (AC), there is nothing to
suggest that the alliance will work in Buhari’s favour. The
statement attributed to one of the foundation members of the AC
Chief Bisi Akande to the effect that the party will not give the
presidential slot to any other party is a clear indication that
a consensus candidate of the two allied parties is not
conceivable.
The last convention of the party further exposed the weaknesses
of the ANPP. One of such weaknesses that are very critical in
determining its fate at the 2007 polls was the manner it managed
the entire convention and particularly the nomination crises
that ensued when Governor Bukar Abba Ibrahim refused to withdraw
from the race as the party leadership requested him to do. The
convention was brought to a standstill for a moment before
Governor Ibrahim finally succumbed to pressure.
Even as he did, he put up a protest looking Buhari in the face
and asking him to incorporate his programmes. What the episode
projected of the party was that each of the aspirants has his
separate programmes from those that the party outlined for
Nigerians, if at all it has any. The confrontational posture of
Governor Ibrahim suggested that the party has no leadership.
There is growing fear among Nigerians that the ANPP will not be
able to manage the country well, if it cannot manage itself.
The manner the consensus candidacy was arrived at portrayed
Buhari as someone that abhors competition and wanted the ticket
on a platter of gold. At a point I was happy when Chief Pere
Ajunwa refused to withdraw and insisted that election must take
place. But I was disappointed when he chickened out at the last
minute due to pressure from fellow aspirants. The entire process
appeared undemocratic and shameful. I thought the ANPP would
adopt the face-saving strategy of the Action Congress (AC), and
go for an election between Buhari and Ajunwa instead of asking
all of its aspirants to step down.
My contention is that the decision was made in error. It was
made under the presumption that Buhari won the 2003 presidential
elections and can repeat the feat in 2007 if only he is allowed
to recontest, and if the process is free and fair. Buhari
himself has confirmed my assertion when he told the delegates
after his nomination that ANPP would form government in 2007, if
a free and fair election were conducted.
It is imperative for Buhari to also consider the big obstacle he
faces among the northern minority. The allegation of religious
bigotry has damaged his image before the northern minority,
especially Christians. They have concern that he would not be
fair to them and their religion if he becomes president. Even if
the fear is not genuine, as it were, the TBO and ANPP should
have improved the chances of the party by shopping for the big
political fishes in the minority circle.
I know the TBO and other Buhari supporters are working under
illusion that they can win the required majority votes in
two-third of 36 states without the northern minority votes so
long as the party will get majority Muslims votes as well as the
Igbo votes. Going by the political equation of past electoral
victories, this assertion could be true. But the question is how
certain is ANPP that Igbos blocked votes will be delivered? Does
Honorable Edwin Ume Ezeoke have the clout to deliver the blocked
votes in view of Governor Orji Kalu’s presidential candidacy of
the Progressive Peoples Alliance (PPA)?
Those that regard the presence of Honorable Ezeoke in the ANPP
as a catalyst to Buhari’s electoral fortune in the south east
should reconsider their stand. My contention is that if Chuba
Okadigbo could not assure Buhari Igbos blocked votes in 2003
when he was his running mate, there is no how Ume-Ezeoke will
deliver the votes to ANPP. Chances are that the PDP will win
majority votes in the south east because the party has much
stronger base unless Nigerians of the Igbo extraction in the
Diaspora are coming home to campaign for the Buhari presidency
and to cast their votes for him in block.
The other thing that may scuttle Buhari’s chances is his choice
of a running mate. I leant from reliable sources that he and the
party caucus are considering three Igbos for the number two
position. The first take is Chief Mike Ahamba (SAN) who was
Buhari’s defense counsel in the 2003 presidential election suit.
The second and third are Dr. Ogbonnaya Onu, the first executive
governor of Abia State and Ken Nnamani the current Senate
President.
Though Ken is a good product to sell in view of the enviable
role he played in scuttling the third term project and his
sterling qualities as a incorruptible and highly principled
politician, he belongs to a different political party. Besides,
he has not on his own indicated any interest in defecting to
another party despite the humiliating defeat he suffered at the
just concluded senatorial primaries in his state.
Dr. Onu could be a good choice but he has lost touch with the
political base of his state talkless of the entire Igboland. It
is not likely that his nomination will bring any dividend to the
party. As for Chief Ahamba, he lacks the political exposure to
be widely accepted as a standard bearer of Igbo interest in the
central government.
The ANPP should search for a seasoned Igbo politician that is
not controversial but a performer in his own right, someone that
is a core professional and independent-minded. But for the
decision of the party leadership to choose his running mate from
the South East, I would have recommended to the ANPP that the
party’s vice presidential nominee come from the south west while
the ANPP zones the position of Senate President to the South
East. It is indeed a hard choice to make for Buhari and his
party but someone must eventually emerge as vice presidential
nominee of the party. My advice is Buhari and his party should
do a thorough job, if they really want to capture central power
in 2007.
Ibrahim Dan-Halilu writes from No. 10 Alkali Road, Badarawa -
Kaduna. |
|